RE: Steem has no free speech and BERNIE SANDERS FOLLOWED/SUPPORTED ME FOR A YEAR!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem has no free speech and BERNIE SANDERS FOLLOWED/SUPPORTED ME FOR A YEAR!

tuckerjtruman in #censorship • 7 years ago

I’m not even sure what you’re talking about, that’s why I asked questions?

I don’t sing to the choir, if anything I’ve expressed since I started my steemit account that I can’t stand Bernie, I don’t even think I’ve interacted with him other than a comment thread from weeks ago.

But you clearly do,
First it was clix, then Bernie, now it’s fulltime.

As for taking their side, i never did. I personally think the whole situation was a misunderstanding on both yours and @llfarms (who started it) part. I think you should reach out to the other side and truly try to resolve this.

Is Bernie being obnoxious and spammy? Yes

Is he cancerous? Of course

Did this whole situation get out of hand? Oh definitely

Is this “harassment” because you exposed clixmoney and the “unfairness” of dtube? No, not even close, Bernie is merely a cancerous troll being obnoxious, I doubt he gives a fuck about clixmoney, dtube or fairness. He’s here for a good time. He’s not downvoting you because you’re some exposer, but rather because he don’t give a fuck.

Posted using Partiko iOS

7 years ago in #censorship by tuckerjtruman

0.00 JAHM

5 votes

Sort:

Trending

[-]

llfarms 7 years ago

Not sure why I’m being tagged here or what you think I started, but I’m done giving manipulative people the attention they desperately seek.

I made a comment about inappropriate comments, the response was to threaten me and try to release personal information. After all that as well as being called every name in the book, I left another (non attacking) comment.. this accounts response proved they had no interest in solving anything.. only playing victim and twisting narratives. So I made a post to show the community what was happening, as this account proved to be mentally unstable.

So if you want to say I started something, please explain.

As far as this being some sort of attack on a whistle blower for “exposing dtube curation” that’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard.. I don’t know this person she speaks of but I’ve spoken to the creator of dtube many times over the last year about the curation and think it’s improved quite a bit.. not sure what that has to do with exploiting an underage child.. as the two are not related.

The account (whoever it is) just wants to try to twist a story to make them not a scumbag, but the blockchain has all the proof needed and my post didn’t even include the worst of it.

So, to wrap this all up.. I started nothing. I just stated the behavior was unacceptable and in return have had thousands of flags and spam comments following me around.

I still stand by what I said, and bringing out the disgusting behavior that was occurring. The truth is all that is needed here, I don’t have to twist anything.

Her and Bernie’s current argument here is on them, as I have no interest in trying to reason with a mentally unstable manipulative individual like whoever has the keys to the kawaii account today.

But as I’m tagged here.. I felt I needed to clarify a few things.

0.00 JAHM

[-]

tuckerjtruman 7 years ago

I didn’t think you were attacking, but what I got from it this all stemmed from the comment and post you made.

I think “started it” wasn’t the right wording.
My point was Bernie is being the way he is because 1. He’s just obnoxious and 2. Because your post brought this to his attention. And that it his turn from supporting kawaii to downvoting her has nothing to do with some bullshit that kawaii “exposed the fraud on steemit”

That’s all.
However thanks for clarity on your point,
Have a blessed day

Posted using Partiko iOS

0.00 JAHM

[-]

llfarms 7 years ago (edited)

I understand, but just so things are clear. He was told about the issue at hand, then she commented on his post and he explained he wouldn’t be supporting her anymore. Around this same time is when I made the first comment, so no.. my post wasn’t the start of this.

It was when I quietly tried to deal with the issue after I discovered the disgusting comments and then shortly after she posted on Bernie’s blog.. he simply told her he unfollowed her and why, no flags.

He only started flagging her when she went to twitter and began threatening people and acting like a full on nutcase in response to one comment informing her of the confusion. He warned her to stop her harassment and threats and then she started in on him. Thats when the flags started.

The timeline of actions is important to see the whole picture.

I understand where you are coming from and will say I don’t agree with many things that bernie does, but I think he’s using his stake to stop a manipulative person who was exploiting her child here.. so I’m pretty ok with it, even if I can’t agree with all the comments here.

He did support her for a long time, so did many others.. until they discovered what she was doing. Her trying to twist this into anything else is just her desperate attempt at grasping straws.

If her response to any of the initial comments (explaining to her that men were confusing photos of a 10yr old with her and responding sexually) was “I had no idea, I’m sorry” and then possibly make a few changes to clarify the issue.. we wouldn’t be here.

Instead, as she’s done in the past when this issue was brought to her, she threatened people and twisted it all to make it seem like she was a victim of something.. but this time that didn’t work.

I will agree that her stating anyone is flagging her for exposing anything is idiotic and just part of her game.

People are flagging her because she was using her 10yr old for the face of her sexy persona and instead of being a responsible adult when these things were brought to her, she went off the deep end.

That’s it, and nothing else.

Thanks for reaching out, have a good day.

0.00 JAHM