Hello, @horpey!
Thank you for this contribution. Your post is informative, comprehensive and well-illustrated with quality screenshots.
On the content side, even though I like all the information provided, I have to admit that I was expecting to see more editorial content in your review. The post tells the readers almost nothing about your personal knowledge, views and experience of using the platform. Furthermore, I must say that I wish you'd shared some more information about the features mentioned, as well as your personal preferences.
That said, I think that you could have done a better job on the presentation side. For the most part, the post looks like a bullet point essay, which makes it hard for the readers to get a flavour of the key points for the whole text. Moreover, I wanted to read a few words about the comparison with Steemit; a table of features looks nice, but we value unique, editorial content.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.