Blackout Venezuela: Observations on the absence of electricity.

in #venezuela7 years ago

Electricity, since its advent, barely two centuries ago, has created more varied and colossal productive forces than all past generations taken together. The subjugation of natural forces, machines, their contribution to means of transport and the communications sector, and all their diverse applications to the life of modern society, who would have suspected that such productive forces slept in the bosom of the electric current?

At a certain moment, electricity, and even more, its practical uses in society, impressed the world. From the voltaic cell, passing through the telegraph to the light bulb until we reach a certain moment in which our houses are not only illuminated by electric lighting, but were gradually filled with domestic appliances until finally reaching the age of digitalization, where even something as fundamental as work, money, communication and transport are intimately linked to it.

As the practical utility of electricity increased people had more time available, not to mention other advantages that are simply offered by it and that something else can not offer, however, to the same extent that this happened people were made increasingly dependent, even today there are entire cities whose existence is relegated to the mere need of the facilities provided by electric power, otherwise were simply unsustainable.

Today I decided to talk about this issue, because for three days, Venezuela, the country where I live, was completely without electricity. Opinions on the cause of such an event vary depending on each person, while officials and a large part of the government's supporters accuse the United States and the Venezuelan political opposition of carrying out a sabotage, many of the opponents accuse the government for not carrying out the maintenance due to the hydroelectric power station.

Given such a scenario of confusion, in which the truth is very diffuse, and where there is no confidence in those who expose the "facts", what I especially add to this conversation would not contribute more than my simple opinion, so, not it is worth mentioning the political diatribe around the event, but rather talking about my observations during this time and about the incredible consequences that there are about the dependence and responsibility that society has today on electricity.

Before, I must say that three days does not seem like a lot of time, not at catastrophic levels at least, but it serves as a small sample of how disoriented society can be if it is taken off guard.

"Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's swimming naked."
Warren Buffett

What happened, in part, reminded me The Trigger Effect, which I saw many years ago and I don't remember it well and that I could not say whether it is good or not, but that it raised the fundamental problem that could result of something as simple as a blackout.

Oh! By the way, I almost forgot, as a direct consequence or not, the blackout also caused the absence of water service, so not only did we not have electricity but there was no water, in fact, the water problem still persists, while I write this does not pass water through the pipes of my house and none of my neighbors either of course.

Having said that, I return to what I was saying, as society becomes more and more interconnected, this time as a result of the practical applications of electricity, it becomes more interdependent, this means that the same task is every time easier to perform, because the work is divided among many people, so even people who don't know and will never work coordinate, however, this also means that if a fundamental segment fails the entire organization will also fail.

The first day without electricity and water was not so hard, because in Venezuela electrical faults are common, however, hardly presented at national level. In previous occasions when there was a failure of the electric power it affected only sectors of a city, so it was enough to leave the house to find a place with electric power, and even, when the failure occurred throughout the city was for a period that, in the worst case, extended from 6 to 8 hours as a maximum average.

So this time the main problem was the lack of communication, people were suddenly isolated from the outside world, it was just they and their neighbors, in many cases, totally unknown people. Can you imagine that? live surrounded by people you don't know, but with whom you never need to communicate until one day, suddenly, you are only surrounded by strangers who have lived next to your home for, even, decades!

At night, the bandits find the perfect moment to act, everything is illuminated by nothing more than the moonlight, while the windows and doors of the houses are often completely open in order to take advantage of the breeze and so resist the heat and mosquitoes that bother the desperate inhabitants who just want to sleep.

That's how later, on the second day without electricity, a lot of people did not even have access to the time of day, their digital clocks, cell phones, computers were not accessible, after the first day the battery of the wireless devices had simply been exhausted, no one expected the electrical failure to last so long and constantly review social networks becomes irresistible, so the coordination at the time of taking transport to their jobs, among other activities, became very complicated. Many people have become so dependent on smartphones that they have dispensed with watches, others never learned the operation of an analog clock.

By this time the food in the refrigerator begins to get damaged, so before that happens people are forced to cook and eat it, or give it to someone who can eat it so that it does not get damaged.

In Venezuela there is also a problem of cash shortage of which I have spoken about in the past, and for that, during this time most of the people could not make use of debit cards, credit, and bank transfers, so cash, which was the logical alternative, simply was not available to most people, and cryptocurrencies were much less inaccessible than they normally are. Bartering was beginning to emerge as the only viable alternative, if the problem had been prolonged for a long period of time, I think that would have been the immediate consequence.

The price of drinking water increased dramatically, experienced a rise in retail between 100% and 200%. And in some places, the magic of the market suddenly made people appear with electric generators offering to charge 10 minutes a cell phone in exchange for 5 US dollars, basically the equivalent of the monthly minimum wage.

On the third day people did not go to work anymore, or at least a few employees were required to do so, anyway it was Sunday, a non-work day for the majority. Personally I managed to avoid any vicissitude without too many problems, however, it was obvious that if the situation lasted for a period of time exceeding at least a week, it would have been very different.

What kept me intrigued during this event was, mainly, social activity. The last months, I would even say that the last two years, I used to see very few people in the streets of the urbanization. Until now I thought that was because the migration had hit the city hard, but whether that is true or not, the reality is that I saw again the streets full of people, children playing, neighbors talking, the absence of electric power took everyone out of their state of digital seclusion, and forced them to interact socially. The media, the government, and even national circumstances, all seemed far away, and everything was subordinated to the immediate and prevailing reality of the moment.

Although the "experiment" or the unfortunate disaster, taking into account that some people paid for this event with their lives, fortunately lasted very little time, it left a very clear impression: if the discovery and practical application of electricity had, and continues to have an incredible revolutionary impact on society, and that in turn places us in a position of dependence, the absence of this same force, today, would have an impact no less incredible, impressive and revolutionary than it had and has its discovery and application.


Image Source: 1

Sort:  

Apologies. One because of what going on in Venezuela and secondly I find your experience a bit humorous as well.

I remember traveling to Haiti a few years ago and the electricity would shut off every 3 hours. So what sounded like an apocalyptic event for you used to be a normal day for me.

Technology has the ability to bring us all closer together, but instead people have used it to fulfill their selfish desires. Going without electricity in my experience, forced everyone to interact with each other, even people you didn't like. It forced you to be more respectful, more resourceful, and become less wasteful with food (no refrigerator to keep food fresh) so everyday you had to look for something to eat. Pretty much everyone had to look out for each other because electricity was no longer going to do it for them.

Almost off topic but I also had to find a way to do nothing in the most literal sense. There wasn't always someone to chitchat with. Usually when we say we say we are doing nothing, we are actually doing something involving some use of electricity, surfing the web or browsing social media. When electricity was out, I would sometimes just look at the stars, something I hadn't done since I was a child. Other times, I would just look at the animals.

Overall, I can't say that life is better without electricity. In many ways the experience was just as inorganic as life with electricity, because everyone was forced to interact with each other. What do you think will happen when the electricity comes back? Will the smiles fade and the people go back into their rooms to browse the web? Back to the 9-5 job where you don't see your loved ones for at least 7 hours? Back to the routine?

We all want organic love and trust, but it will never be as easy as pulling the plug.

I can identify with what you say. I also did nothing for some time, or look at the stars, or just observe anything. It's pretty amazing how we are adapted to electricity. Of course, in Venezuela there are frequent blackouts (once or twice a month where I live), although they never last as long.

In a certain way, moments of crisis are hated by all, but in the long run, they unite people more, and bring new perspectives. That's true every time. I don't think either that life is better without electricity, that would be quite reductionist, but if it does us good to be aware of how dependent we are becoming of it.

HaHa! I just have to laugh about a scenario that just happened inside me because of your exchanges. I was thinking that those who have sovereignty over electricity would deliberately turn off electricity for a few days several times a quarter. A kind of hidden higher power to create small awakening experiences for the benefit of people. Something like what just happened to you in Venezuela and happens occasionally. The moments of doing nothing and being forced to find alternatives are not the worst. A system that always works perfectly doesn't offer such dropouts. And basically we all succumb to the illusion that we want perfection and certainty.

In truth, we all agree when unforeseen things happen because they put us in a surprising situation - unless they bring death. The longing for surprises and challenges we are currently experiencing mainly virtually, through computer games and other technologies. Unless you live in a country where this is not yet the case. Recently I was very surprised when I spoke to a Syrian woman who told me that the concept of bank transfers is not applied in her country, even in Damascus (as she said). People go there and pay their water and electricity bills in cash to the authorities. Since they also receive their wages in cash. At least at the level of the less affluent, this is how it is handled.

The moments without electricity can be very enlightening, I believe that being totally free to do anything can mean the development of very deep thoughts, and very good insights.

I think the only system that works perfectly is the world, and it does offer such dropouts. I also believe that the illusion is to want perfection and certainty, when in fact, we already have it, we only need to observe well around us and give an account of the why of each thing, because everything has a reason, a good reason, even if we don't understand it.

I'm really tired now, I just connect for a moment, tomorrow I'll answer your other comments in deep and I will review your blog. See ya.

I was already wondering where you were. I'm glad you're well and healthy. I had asked myself briefly how I would actually find out if you got sick or something like that. Are you also reachable on discord? I think I've asked that before. I will get back to you soon and give you some feedback on your experience of the last days. First of all I wish you that you enjoy the water and that there is electricity again.
Sincerely,

Erika

:) I can only appreciate your interest. Sorry, I don't currently have a discord account, I'm only in Steemit for now.

How are you? on the other side, are you okay? That's really a more important question, because in Venezuela, things like these happen more or less often, only they don't last long. How is everything there in Germany?

Thank you, I am fine so far. As you have already seen I was somewhat worried with my thoughts on AI, went through a tale of desperation but found support in more calm and rational texts and people. Usually, the Buddhists save me from falling insane.

Worry is really one of the worst things as it creates a lot of suffering. That does not help in remaining calm. It's maybe because I am a mother and care for the next genereations. But then I also care for humankind on a whole and wish others well.

People do take things really way too personal, I realize this ever so often in my work with clients. I feel like an ambassador who endlessly explains that almost nothing what authorities or others are telling one is ever meant so personal. Most people care more about themselves than about the other and many of the insults people think are hidden in responses or letters are pure illusion.

What makes me happy is when I see that a client drops the dime, thus has a aha-experience in which it becomes clear to him or her that most what he thought was projection.
I find a lot of consolation in my work.

Germany is a land of milk and honey, if you ask me. We have EVERYTHING from the material point of view. We live better than the kings & queens of past eras, yet we think that we suffer. This suffering is clearly psychological and I think the core of it is that we all are aware of the fact that someone else pays the price. This guilt must be worked on and taken into a realistic mental performance in order to feel self effectiveness and coming out of the victim mode.

I am looking forward to spring. A dropout would do us good, I think.

I really liked your humorous and at the same time realistic point of view on the recent dropout. I feel thankful that you described this situation from your point of view and also gave us some observations along with it.

Sweet and sour comes always in a pack.

Bye for now, my friend.

Worry, like anxiety, indeed creates a lot of suffering. For some reason we think that by suffering from the problems we will solve them. The solution, as you say, is in the calm and reason, for me it is like this, because if you examine thoroughly the problems that are so feared, there really is not much reason to be afraid of them, and most of the time is unfounded.

To some, meditation helps them to solve problems, to keep calm, without thinking, and all that, although I really believe that it is not for everyone. For me the best solution is always to analyze the problems thoroughly, logically, chatting with myself, and finally realize that what I feared is not really fearsome, and that for what I worry about, it would be good to leave to worry. Only after doing this can I find calm.

For the rest, both in the AI, as in the Gestalt thing and everything else, our views are almost always quite similar, only that I almost never give my point of view but how I think things should be. And not as I want.

Both sweet and sour serve for something. :)


Also, I think that people, perhaps, should always take things personally, because if people feel they are referred, it is because they feel that what is said is true (in some way) in their case (if not, it would not bother us at all). Although only if they are always willing to improve and not to give up. The illusions that people see always have something real, because on the one hand, there must be a cause for that illusion to be taken as true, and second, there must be something personal that we are projecting, and therefore, we must take personally. Although that does not mean that we should react to that personally.

Like a few months ago, I read something and it bothered me, but then I realized that it was only my interpretation, however, my interpretation was a way in which I myself gave my opinion to me placing it in the text of another.

I don't think that modern people, even in Germany, live better than the kings of the past, we surely have more trinkets and mirrors like the story of the Indians and the Spaniards, but that does not mean that we live better. I even think that having a lot of material wealth can confuse the mind of really important things, psychological things above all, going from suffering because of others, like when we get upset about what others do or don't do, to suffering because of ourselves, like when we feel guilty, but suffering show us...

Anyway, a dropout would be good, if you think. See ya.

Right, thanks for expanding the thought. I want to add another example:

The other day I had a client who received a notice from the authority informing her only of the amount and a small increase in her payment. Since the authorities are obliged to draw attention to the duty of the beneficiaries to cooperate, as well as to the fact that an official decision may be appealed against within one month, my client suspected that there was a knowledge behind it of what affected her personally.

She suspected that people knew about her personal plans and that she was therefore called upon to respond to this letter. She was afraid that her money could be cut or even cancelled altogether and revealed her complete ignorance of the legal situation. Many of my clients suspect a greater knowledge behind the letters they receive and take requests for cooperation as wantonness that they would be unnecessarily controlled and harassed. The additions of legal means are only a standard reference and no more.

But she expressed herself in such a way that she found it insolent that she was so pressured to reveal her personal plans. Letters are still perceived as very personal, as if there were a letter writer who would have written one in personal thought to the recipient. But this is not the case. Most official letters are automated and machine-made letters, nobody was involved. These are completely impersonal, purely factual contents.

This circumstance points to what you said: that the personal reference is basically intentional and the impersonal in an action is considered wrong. But if you confuse a purely business contract with an intimate relationship, you get the feeling that you are invisible as a human being and only visible as an object. This is not what people want.

This means that people in other places suffer from lack of personal relationship and basically their feeling is right, but placed in the wrong spot. So the client may have the right feeling - her life is too impersonal overall - and she always projects this lack exactly onto the situations she is getting into. It would be better to realize that this feeling of lack has its justification and to see how and where it can be satisfied. Also I told her, it's a good thing and an accomplishment of past efforts that citizens have certain rights and duties and that this is made clear, so it gives some certainty.

On a meta-level, the client is right insofar as a reduced personal contact between authorities and citizens is perceived as true. In fact, in the past it was possible to get a personal appointment much faster and even telephoning was associated with far fewer hurdles.

Material wealth: Yes, that was what I meant. So I exaggerated a little bit to make the point clear. I agree on that notion and explanation of yours.

As far as I got to know you you seem to be an mindful person who gets himself caught in acts of which you can change perspectives. That is a good quality and I appreciate it a lot that you have it.

You have a very good psychological approach. I think that with such an approach you can cover everyone very good, although not everything.

For example, projections are not the only type of illusions, the feeling of lack is also another illusion. Because when we feel that we lack something, we are isolating ourselves from everything else, believing that we are alone and suffering for that. The human is not perfect in itself, and needing things from the outside it indicates precisely that it is part of the "outside".

The feeling of lack produces the desire, and the desire leads us to plan and search for things in a forced way, which causes the suffering.

The trick is not to look for the things we want, because we don't get them while we look them. Although for that it's need a lot of confidence, first in nature, and second in us.

That means that there is no wrong spot, because wherever we go it will be that spot, it's just about finding creative solutions to the problems ;)

The only difference between a purely business contract and an intimate relationship is the confidence of the parties, that has to do with what they say over there that everything that has to do with people has to do also with relationships.

Also, the only way to become invisible as human beings is by forgetting ourselves.

Thank you very much for the compliment, although maybe I'm not a mindful person, maybe you're just making a projection :)

Oh, of course, to what the self is grasping, is an illusion. I think we talked to a satisfying degree about those self illusions, didn't we?

So I think people have to work on self realization in order to come to the conclusion that there is no real self.

In my work with clients I do one step after the other. Mostly it's about creating an atmosphere of trust and letting myself not being caught on grasping:) When I can succeed in letting go of judgemental thoughts, the sessions become really light and humorous.

In how I meant it, there is "a wrong spot" as the person has not yet realized that neediness must be contemplated with oneself before it's expressed in front of others as a demand, a desire, an order, a mandate etc.

If that happened and is realized then yes, it's true what you say that there is no wrong spot.

I wonder if a reading audience gets better what is meant by this exchange of our thoughts. I hope so.

The only difference between a purely business contract and an intimate relationship is the confidence of the parties, that has to do with what they say over there that everything that has to do with people has to do also with relationships.

I don't know if I understood that. A contract is designed in order to gain clarity about the nature of the relationship and to make the conditions transparent.

The nature of the relationship between the recipient of social benefits and the paying authority as the representative of the legislature is purely business. At least that is how it is presented. However, it is also somehow clear that in reality it is not a purely business relationship and this is the reason for the discomfort of the beneficiaries and the partial moral superiority of welfare.

However, I think it is best to pretend it is a cool business relationship, because I think morality has to be kept out, because otherwise it intervenes in this relationship from both sides in a very corrosive way and does more harm than good. Nevertheless, a moral value is still important, but you have to cultivate it within yourself and not give responsibility to the other. So both, the bureaucrat and the welfare recipient were good advised to act virtuous.

No, I am not projecting, I just followed your observation about yourself reading something and then changing your perspective - So maybe I should not say that you are a mindful person but you had a mindful moment ;-)

Yeah, you're right, there is not much to add.

The concepts of hydraulic despotism and key log are lost to those who chase utopia. Government control of certain fundamental resources that fuel civilization can not be avoided. The state monopoly on irrigation water, salt, currency, electricity, standards of measure, etc. allow for communal cohesion through ease of internal trade. The absence of such despotic monopoly results in disintegration of the sociopolitical matrix and eventual "decentralization," or local tribalism.

I agree.