@skepticology I have no control over what @magicdice votes on. They randomly select someone that plays with a 1-100% vote on a random post.
I like playing the game, so should I stop playing it because you think the vote is wrong. Why don't you contact @magicdice and complain to them about it.
Here's your DRAMA. Don't spend it all in one place!
To view or trade DRAMA go to steem-engine.com.
If you disagree with reward size then why not correct it with @spaminator or @steemflagrewards? Your complacency means that you are fine with reward pool abuse as long as you are the beneficiary.
Even if I wanted to flag it, I can't flag with @spaminator or @steemcleaners because it's not an abusive post. I posted that comment not knowing I would be upvoted at all, it is a response to @anthonyadavisii post, I didn't post it in the hopes of getting a $10 upvote. If you look at 99.9% of my comments since I joined Steem they get between 0 and and a few cents. How the fuck am I supposed to know if I'm going to get a $10 vote. I've rarely had votes of that size.
@spaminator or @steemcleaners do not deal with reward disagreements. They are used to flag abuse such as plagiarism and posts like yours which are designed to farm rewards on purpose. They serve zero value. If you want to run a contest, vote the winners with your own stake, or buy some Steem to hand it out as prizes, or find a sponsor. It's really that simple.
If you have an issue with who @magicdice decides to vote on, or how they decide to do it, then contact them and every single one of their delegators to propose a solution on how it could be done better instead of acting like a baby and blaming me for your abuse.
Then, you clearly don’t understand the scope which those groups operate on. This is a @magicdice issue.
This falls under personal disagreement. You may flag at your own leisure.
Did @spaminator flag participants of your contest when you are the source of it?
Do you not flag posts for "bid bot abuse" because of excessive rewards even though the vote was from a different account? The #1 reason for a flag is "Disagreement on rewards." The rewards for this comment are excessive and abusive towards the rewards pool. It does not matter where the votes came from or whether or not they were random.
Do you not flag posts for "bid bot abuse" because of excessive rewards even though the vote was from a different account? The #1 reason for a flag is "Disagreement on rewards." The rewards for this comment are excessive and abusive towards the rewards pool. It does not matter where the votes came from or whether or not they were random.
Then flag it yourself. Do not tag SFR in your comments when you have never bothered to step inside our Discord to see how we define stuff.
Discord is an insecure 3rd party application irrelevant to this blockchain and there is no reason you cannot discuss it here where the actions in question have taken place unless you are afraid of public exposure. As the 'old' saying goes, "blockchain or it didn't happen."
Having trouble juggling your accounts?
Here’s the deal. Your interpretation of what YOU think we flag is actually pretty far off from our definitions.
Almost everyone uses Discord due to the piss poor nature of community features on the chain.
I will not be bothered to bend to every single person who wishes for me to type things out every time.
Good day.
Do not reply. Our Discord is public.
If you don't like what I have to say there is a mute function. Your discord has nothing to do with this blockchain and does not offer security, historical archiving, or search functions. It's clear you don't care about reducing spam or abuse as much as protecting and rewarding your friends. If you actually cared about my understanding of the SFR function then you would have linked clear instructions on the blockchain. Your abrasive approach and hypocrisy do more harm than good for STEEM.
