individuals can vote for who ever they want.
No vote representing the organization is to be made.
That maybe should be worded clearer.
individuals can vote for who ever they want.
No vote representing the organization is to be made.
That maybe should be worded clearer.
The additional sentence clarifies what the account will be doing in not voting for witnesses.
I'm still stuck on:
... unless said member is a witness themselves and are speaking from a non-Foundation standpoint.
Why do they have to be a witness themselves?
Support for individual witnesses should never be implied, directly or indirectly, by any Foundation account or active board member unless said member is speaking from a non-Foundation standpoint.
e.g. Any board member can speak positively or negatively (by votes or text) towards a witness as long as they aren't using the foundation account?
Good luck on this! :D
As long as they are not using a foundation account OR representing themselves as being part of it.
That is pretty standard in any organization I've been part of leadership with, when speaking on a matter there has to be clarity if speaking personally or as part of the group leadership.
Yes I understand, just wanted it to be clear in the text so that it's simple and there can be no doubt :)
Here are your ENGAGE tokens!
To view or trade ENGAGE go to steem-engine.com.